With all the recent controversy over the expenditures of some Senators, I would like to comment on the Senate itself. Even in the 21st Century, I do believe Canada benefits from having the Senate. The Senate is supposed to act as a place of sombre second thought of legislation. And it does so at the moment.
Can the Senate be ‘updated’ or changed? Probably. Although I am a traditionalist and can live with the Senate the way it is, that does not mean that I could not see some changes, mainly in how people are appointed to the Senate.
At the moment, a Canadian over over 30 who owns at least $4,000 worth of assets in the the province he/she will represent may be appointed to the Senate and does not need to retire until he/she reaches the age of 75. Continue reading